Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NYS Collection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

NYS Collection

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All the citations are self-published. A WP:BEFORE Google search turned up no independent in-depth WP:RS sources. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment No opinion yet on notability, but I see that content has twice before been deleted for WP:COPYVIO, and much of the current content, added on 31 January, is again copied and pasted from the company website. There also seem to be issues of WP:COI in the editing history. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP. Sourcing is in passing and / ot WP:SPIP, insufficient for establishing notability. Also qualifies as WP:G11. --K.e.coffman (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.