Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N - Creation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Article has been A-7 speedied by, thus rendering this discussion moot.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 14:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

N - Creation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film company I dream of horses (T) @ 17:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, only source is the guy's own blog. Kage Acheron (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, non-notable compnay. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, no coverage in reliable sources found so far. Results that turn up in Google search are for Rootz N Creation.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as A7. This appears to be a fairly non-notable company with no true assertions of notability per Wikipedia's guidelines, so I'm going to tag this accordingly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually it looks like this is one of several pages created by a COI editor. I'll warn him about spam on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks like this is an attempt to evade detection since this was already speedied at N-Creation and the editor's past history shows similar habits with articles for himself. This warning is going to turn into a block. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.