Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naba Bhuyan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Assam cricketers. Daniel (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Naba Bhuyan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm  (talk)  19:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - WP:GNG is irrelevant here, as he passes WP:CRIN, which is the relevant notability guideline, by virtue of having played in a first class match. DevaCat1 (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Assam cricketers or similar Has played 1 FC match, but no coverage. Using similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has 1 or a few matches but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 13:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete none of the sources provide the significant coverage which is needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to List of Assam cricketers. No significant coverage so fails GNG, which trumps the trivial pass of NCRIC, which is by consensus a very weak SNG for cricketers such as this with very few recorded appearances and no consequential contributions. Redirection is an accepted ATD. wjematherplease leave a message... 17:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per parallel discussion, same arguments — Alalch Emis (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.