Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabarro LLP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. and tag for de-spamming JohnCD (talk) 23:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Nabarro LLP

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I've reluctantly declined a speedy deletion on this one, as it's not quite spammy enough. I'm offering it up for judgment to the AfD editors as my inclinations are notoriously to deletion. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Well established article that of which meets guidelines. Western Pines (talk) 03:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So it's well established and meets the guidelines, but you want to delete it? -- Boing!   said Zebedee  11:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Advertising: The firm works with high-profile clients across a broad range of industry sectors...  All I see are attempts to claim inherited notability by non-notable listings and trade awards: has been recognised for their ranking in the Corporate Advisers Ranking Guide published by Hemscott as featuring in the top 20 listings of law firms advising stock market clients.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Was previously speedy'd and afd for the same reason.  16x9 (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Rewrite Currently the article reads as spam and needs rewriting, but this is a significant law firm in the english legal market and meets WP:ORG easily ( for example here is a long list of coverage in one of the major industry publications http://www.legalweek.com/category/law-firms/nabarro) so i will try and cut out much of the junk and then come back here. Ajbpearce (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Regrettably because it's annoying to keep spammy articles, but the subject does appear to be notable and this page is not exclusively spam per G11. This looks to me to amount to significant coverage (even when you get rid of unreliable sources) amounting to notability. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. Yes, spammy, but easily notable as one of the Top-30 UK law firms. THF (talk) 02:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep to my mind the article contains some good content and is not solely outright promotional. Nabarro are a mid-sized UK law firm, the work they do and firm's movements are covered regularly by many reliable sources such as The Lawyer and Legal Week . Basic information about the firm from independent sources can be harder to identify online - due to the volume of news - but will be available in different written guides and reports aims at professionals, graduates, etc. To sum up - the information to create a decent article is almost certainly out there and I don't think the current one is bad enough to warrant deletion at this time. Guest9999 (talk) 01:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.