Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabatieh Fawka massacre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Nabatieh Fawka massacre

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not noteworthy, no continuous news and further, editor has NPOV titled the article by calling it a massacre. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment You are saying that the usual erratic bombing mode of civilian areas employed by the IAF may kill 9 members of a family, but the incident is not notable? Massacre 'refers to the killing of multiple individuals and is usually considered to be morally unacceptable, especially when perpetrated by a group of political actors against defenseless victims.' The use of the word here is very precise.Nishidani (talk) 13:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * We go by RS here, as I'm sure you are aware. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:36, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, eminent RS note that this was a gross violation of human rights. So the implication is that 'gross violations of human rights' are not notable. Well they are usually, but then, here we are dealing with Arabs.Nishidani (talk) 13:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep There is no case for deletion. It is covered by many reliables suorces. -- Maudslay II (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep GNG met, a meritless nomination. Problems with the name can be dealt with via RM if necessary.Selfstudier (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

* Keep Wikipedia is not censored, seems like a POV pushing nomination to wipe the record of Israeli massacres.Shadybabs (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * User:2600:1700:4380:1100:5d7b:a924:8f43:c0fc, you struck out this vote. Care to explain why? Are you User:Shadybabs? J I P  &#124; Talk 17:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I explained why in my edit summary - ARBPIA sanctions. users with less than 500 edits are not allowed to participate in AfD discussions in this topic area. That's something I expect an administrator to know.
 * Doesn't that mean you can't participate either? And yet, you are, why not sign in?Selfstudier (talk) 09:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, certainly notable and well sourced. If there is a problem with the name then it calls for a move, not deletion. J I P  &#124; Talk 13:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow keep; as other have stated, this is a meritless nomination. Just imagine: a bomb from Lebanon, killing 9 people, 7 of whom were children in 1996...in Israel? Tell me, Sir Joseph; would you have called such an article for "not  noteworthy"? I think such an article would have been, say a 20-100 K article, possibly a WP:FA, too, by now. Huldra (talk) 22:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.