Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadežda Pavlović


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Nadežda Pavlović

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per BLP1E and/or WP:NOPAGE. '''She was not even supercentenarian (person who is/was aged 110+). In fact, she was only 109 years and 3 months old.''' Also, the author of this article seems to have determined that she is a or "was the oldest known living person in Serbia" recognized by an organization called ESO, but I don't think ESO is an internationally recognized and prestigious longevity science organization, unlike Gerontology Research Group. More famous and prominent articles about the oldest people, the country's oldest person titieholder, have also been deleted in the past like Articles for deletion/Misao Okawa (2nd nomination), Articles for deletion/Yukichi Chuganji (4th nomination), Articles for deletion/Mamie Eva Keith (2nd nomination), etc. There is no reason to keep only this article of the oldest person in a small country like Serbia, when considering impartiality...--Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 10:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions 10:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Bosnia and Herzegovina,  and Serbia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.