Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nader Mousavizadeh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ and no indication more input is forthcoming. Star  Mississippi  02:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Nader Mousavizadeh

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Most of news are primarily routine, as he was with Kofi Annan. No significant independent coverage, fails Notability. Not sure, why he is notable, if he has a page as he was former United Nations official, every former United Nations official should be there on Wikipedia. Fishgrail2 (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politics,  and Denmark.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * As a former advisor to a UN Secretary General (rather than standard official), and author, and quoted commentator in the FT, New York Times etc it is helpful to have an independent source of authority on Mousavizadeh. He is also the CEO of a large international company that often get press attention and is referenced in other Wikipedia articles. It is helpful to have it all in one place and for the article to be expanded especially given his role on the WRI board and Trilateral commission? Bournemouth1066 (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:NAUTHOR for co-authoring Kofi Annan's memoir which is a work that won significant critical attention. Also passes WP:GNG, more broadly.—Alalch E. 14:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.