Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Dyall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result wasDeleteBlnguyen (bananabucket) 04:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Nadia Dyall
Non-notable Australian student in a relationship with actor Gary Sweet. -- Longhair\talk 12:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Longhair\talk 12:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Longhair\talk 12:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Nadia is a well known Australian celebrity. As well as appearing in TV shows including Neighbours and Stingers, she has appeared in magazines including Australian Women's Weekly, FHM and New Idea.  She is regularly featured in Newspaper articles in the Herald Sun and the Daily Telegraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSmgmt (talk • contribs)
 * Please provide a source for your claim that this person is a "well known Australian celebrity" because there are several Australians here who have never heard of her. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 13:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Apparently nn other than for relationship to actor. Merge content into Gary Sweet article, and then delete. -- The Anome 12:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - hmmm, what does "GSmgmt" stand for? Gary Sweet's Management? Anyway, seems non-notable in the acting field - bit parts it looks like. Regular appearance in gossip columns do not maketh notable media references. --Canley 14:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Google search for her name returns precisely 13 unique hits (two of which are here on Wikipedia). Not a good indicator - even a fairly minor celebrity should produce a few mentions on celebrity gossip sites and the like. Merge any useful, verifiable content into Gary Sweet per The Anome. ~Matticus TC 22:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Kf4bdy talk contribs 00:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google News comes up with nothing see . Nor does Google News Archive . There are seven articles in EBBSCO's Australia New Zealand database which contain's seven articles all indicating that she is in a relationship with Gary Sweet. An article from the Sunday Herald Sun of 22 May 2005 states "They met on the set of Stingers, in which Nadia appeared briefly." Further, "But he's says life is good with Nadia, a marketing executive who used to work for Hockey Australia. She still plays in a team which Sweet manages." Worth a brief mention in the Gary Sweet article but not as a standalone article. Capitalistroadster 00:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. information changes too regularly and is inaccurate. Who cares who Nadia is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.26.235.14 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, being the partner of a notable actor is not notable in itself. Lankiveil 05:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC).
 * Must delete, no relevence here. Is Gary Sweet even a celeb? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.15.176 (talk • contribs) -- Longhair\talk 12:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a not notable shop assistant, per nom. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 13:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete article. No place for shop attendents on Wikipedia.
 * Delete Shop attendent doesn't mean she is a celeb. Google search on gives back reference to wikipedia, and other infromation taken from this link.  Delete ASAP.
 * As the main contributor of this site, please delete, it was created for publicity reasons for Nadia and therefore doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Delete.  User:GSmgmt
 * Delete. non-notable.  --Roisterer 12:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Article should be Deleted and searches should be refered to Gary Sweet. GSmgmt 04:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)GSmgmt
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.