Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Essex (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. An experienced editor like should know that it is bad form to renominate an article 17 days after the previous AfD. This should not be taken to AfD again before at least 4-6 months have passed. Randykitty (talk) 14:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Nadia Essex
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor tv personality who fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR/WP:ENTERTAINER. Most of the coverage is generated out of their participation in the single show, Celebs Go Dating, some of which is simply promotional material. Appears to fit WP:BIO1E.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep This has already been through AfD in the last month, nominated by the same person and there was no consensus to delete it., I really don't think this should just have been brought back here, especially so quickly and when there was a good amount of participation in that discussion. Just from the sources in the article, there are reliable sources such as the Independent, the Guardian, the Evening Standard and the BBC. She is most well-known for Celebs Go Dating but there has also been extensive coverage of her legal battles and her other work such as Celebrity Ghost Hunt and Celebrity Coach Trip - the coverage clearly meets WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. There were some promotional additions, but that isn't a reason for deletion, I just deleted that information. Boleyn (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Sorry to disagree with you on this one, but all the in-depth stuff stems almost solely out of their participation in a single television program, so imho WP:BIO1E would apply. And although it was closed as non-consensus, other than your keep !vote, the other two where simple drive by votes. Onel 5969  TT me 22:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep the article could use more content (but it's not for a lack of her generating it regularly)  Orville1974  (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.