Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Hilton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Nadia Hilton

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No significant reliable sources found, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 00:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Very Strong Delete This is basically nothing more then a porn page. Full of links to porn sites etc. etc. Not notable even in porn probably. This isn't encyclopedic at all! Pstanton 00:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * According to our own page on porn: "Pornography or porn is the explicit depiction of sexual subject matter with the sole intention of sexually exciting the viewer." The article itself is not porn and the links to porn sites are not surprising since the article is about a porn actress. Porn actors can be encyclopedic. - Mgm|(talk) 08:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Epbr123. Tabercil (talk) 01:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete meets none of the entertainer or WP:PORNBIO standards. - Mgm|(talk) 08:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.