Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Russ: NeoPopRealism

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Already redirected. --Ryan Delaney talk 11:33, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Nadia Russ: NeoPopRealism
Appears to be vanity and/or advertising. This is a CV, not an encylopedia article. -- The Anome 14:38, July 30, 2005 (UTC)


 * 'Note: The VfD tag was removed from this article the same day it was listed and not replaced until today. Because of the low number and ambiguous nature of the votes, I am re-listing the article so the process may be completed. I am not voting.'' -- Essjay ·  Talk 13:25, August 6, 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. Even if the artist is notable, the article is a bleeding mess and needs to be moved to the proper namespace. I'll change my vote to keep if someone can establish notability (maybe her own art exhibition or something along those lines). Fernando Rizo T/C 19:08, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. The publications section of Nadia Russ' website points out some news coverage, including a NYT Magazine blurb. Good enough for me. Fernando Rizo T/C 18:17, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

__ Here more info on notability: []. "Delete" was based on first version, when it was just number of art exhibits. New version made after note 'delete'. Article will be developed.  Fernando Rizo T/C 20:31, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Move to an appropriate name if kept - current name is nonsensical. FCYTravis 18:56, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Of course, total agreement with above. Fernando Rizo T/C 20:31, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.