Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadigan Kural


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Nadigan Kural

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The film was not even released. No any coverage and fails Film notability A.Minkowiski_Lets t@lk 11:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 00:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 00:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * alts:
 * director:
 * producer:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * star:
 * studio:
 * WP:INDAFD: Nadigan Kural M.G.C. Chandran M.G.C. Sukumar A. Jagannathan Saira Banu M.N. Nambiar M.C. Brothers


 * Delete for failing WP:NF. Understanding that even an unreleased film might meet inclusion criteria of WP:NFF (paragraph 3), I gave the thing a face-lift per MOS:FILM. Sadly, pre-internet Indian films are difficult to source, and it never being released makes it more difficult. While the cast and crew are sourcable (even with some now deceased), I could not find suitable coverage for this 1981 project. If someone comes forward with Tamil-language sources, ping me. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails every notability guideline. Searches turn up nothing. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Expanding on MichaelQSchmidt's comments, WP:NFF would allow for an article if the failure to be distributed was notable in itself.  But the article tells us only that the failure to distribute was for "several reasons", without sourcing the statement or even telling us what those reasons were.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not yet convincing of the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  04:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.