Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadine Shah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Pamzeis  ( talk ) 01:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Nadine Shah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article uses social media sites and some other trivial mentions as references. I think these are not WP:RS. This article should be deleted. UserNumber (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. UserNumber (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. UserNumber (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 13. UserNumber (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  08:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - I strongly disagree with the rationale for deletion here. Her work has been reviewed in-depth by several reliable sources. Here are just some:   . 3 of her albums have charted in the UK as well . The article is poor and needs improving but I think deletion is wrong.  Spiderone  08:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - she was also nominated for the Mercury Prize not long ago. Other reliable sources covering her in depth The Guardian inews New Statesman Independent Spiderone  09:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Spiderone has clearly shown that Shah meets WP:MUSIC by criteria 2, 8, and 1 (which is just a re-stating of GNG/BASIC). Three of her albums have Wiki pages and are hence likely notable, hence also meeting MUSIC crit. 10. But, a simple google news search will show that she meets WP:GNG/WP:BASIC pretty easily so we don't even really need to consider the fact that she handily meets the appropriate SNGs. Samsmachado (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:GNG; examples of significant coverage in independent reliable sources have been listed above by Spiderone. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Clearly notable given even a cursory Google search. This is a ludicrous nomination. --Michig (talk) 08:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: she's been shortlisted for the Mercury Music Prize and, per Spiderone's comment, her albums have charged charted. Clearly passes WP:NMUSICIAN. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources have been identified in this discussion so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:12, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.