Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagaland (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Nagaland (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The links on this page are all WP:Partial title matches, many of which are already linked from Nagaland. Ultimately, "Nagaland" is not ambiguous. This page is therefore not required. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nagaland-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Maybe rename or merge - I agree it doesn't look like other disamb pages but seems like it might be useful for navigation purposes. JMWt (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It's redundant with Category:Nagaland. The main difference is that a disambiguation page gets a hatnote at the very top of the article, while a category is relegated to the very bottom. This is a bit jarring, but that's how it's been since forever, because hatnotes are meant to resolve ambiguity. If there's no actual ambiguity, just partial title matches, it really doesn't make sense for such a list to get a link in the hatnote. And having a "list of things whose name includes the term Nagaland" runs awfully close to violating the principles described in WP:SHAREDNAME, so even if that mainly relates to categorization it might still be controversial for an index. Plus, it seems a bit contrived, cf. WP:LISTN. --Joy (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.