Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagar Bhaban


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Nagar Bhaban

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

NN building. PROD denied. UtherSRG (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Bangladesh. UtherSRG (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - of architechontical and historical interest. Listed as national heritage building "Outstanding additions to the architectural heritage of the city in recent years include the Nagar Bhaban, ..." , "Nagar Bhaban is the result of a philosophy of assimilation and reflects a contemporary trend of rustic regionalism . In this building , elements from the colonial past have been freely employed . The façade articulation , proportioning [...]" . --Soman (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep article is vis-a-vis a significant municipal building which houses the HQ of Dhaka South City Corporation, should satisfy WP:N. Original objection raised by the editor who filed for deletion was on the grounds of there being no sources, a source has been inserted so deletion is unwarranted.—AMomen88 (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Can either of you, voting for keep, expand the article or add more sources?Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge- to Dhaka South City Corporation, whose headquarters is Nagar Bhaban.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh has devoted significant coverage to the architecture of this important building. Cullen328 (talk) 03:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.