Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagara (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Nagara (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass.

PROD removed because "It's a notable film released in PIFF Toronto 2015. IFFA .. Punjabi International film festival Toronto and International film festival Toronto.. I have already provided the times of india link..and I think I times of india is the one of the biggest news paper in the world and in india.. so please. If they posted an article means the film is notable.. please do not remove the film article"

However, the Times of India "article" isn't an article...it is a film database listing. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Here's the link of iffsatoronto & pifftoronto the article about all event of that day. https://www.iffsatoronto.com/the-4th-annual-iffsa-piff-toronto-announces-an-exciting-line-up-of-films-and-events/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Team Sukhjas (talk • contribs) 06:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 16:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - a database profile page and a passing mention are not enough. No reviews in reliable sources, no significant awards, not apparently influential; clearly fails WP:NFILM. Not even a hint of significant coverage so comprehensively fails WP:GNG. Not a shred of notability. It's cases like this that make me wish that we had a speedy deletion A7 for films. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete passing mentions are not enough, fails WP:NFILM. Pilean (talk) 20:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable film. Kolma8 (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFILM. I wish we had a speedy deletion for films also Rogermx (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.