Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nageshwara Rao Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 06:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Nageshwara Rao Park
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

non-notable park The Banner talk 04:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Most source material on Nageshwara Rao Park has one sentence each on the topic. An example is Times of India April 14, 2012. non-notable park. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 03:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep One of the famous parks in Chennai. The article has 3 refs. Here are two more: 12. Definitely notable. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 15:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * True, thare are five trivial mentions of the park. But not one of the sources describes the park. The Banner talk 15:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * This and this are trivial to you? -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 17:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, they are. The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 17:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The two sources do "describe" the park. They are not trivial. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 18:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The first is a personal impression that fails WP:RS, and refers to the history of the part in a rather trivial manner. Your second link is a video version of the first article. So what you give is just one source, not two... <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 19:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * How about this? ENVIS. This exclusively describes the park. Anyways, will try to find more citations. :) Rasnaboy (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That is more like it, Rasnaboy! <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 19:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please avoid Baseless arguments. The article has 5 refs and is not going to get deleted. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 19:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Baseless? Please read Identifying reliable sources, Anbu! And be happy that Rasnaboy responded by improving the article... <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 19:54, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The article has four refs from The Hindu, a national newspaper of India, which is of course a reliable source. What else could I say if you call them as trivial. Sorry, if it was offensive. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 20:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You have to judge the quality of the article that you want to use as source, not the newspaper. <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 21:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree that the sources currently used are mostly passing mentions, but there is this article listed as a reference where the park is the featured subject of the article. Additionally, I found this article on composting in the park, and this article about the park's speaker's forum.  This is just the English language sources which I feel are sufficient to establish notability, and I would venture to guess there are non-English sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: shows real potential. Some coverage in third party sources to meet the WP:GNG. Needs more to fully establish notability, but I believe there are non-English language sources out there. I freely admit I might be wrong. Vcessayist (talk) 23:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.