Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naghar (Pashtun tribe)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Naghar (Pashtun tribe)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Total nonsense in bad English (sample quote: "An Australian camel belongs to this tribe. They purchased it from Musakhel. Still one can find a Naghar man with 40 camels in the Sulaman mountains near Musakhail. With the passage of time, the demand of animals is decreasing. However, some have made it to Karachi and started alternate professions in the corporate world."). There might be a Naghar Pashtun tribe, and it might even be notable enough to have an article, but this joke/nonsense article needs to go, and a new article created from scratch. And with sources supporting it. Thomas.W talk 21:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Once again, I am amazed that an article such as this has survived so long. There do appear to be some potential sources here. I'd need to take a closer look at them to work out whether a rewritten article is viable. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - As per the nominator, no references at all to verify the subject's notability. Completely fails WP:GNG. KC Velaga  ☚╣✉╠☛  14:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete pending evidence of significant coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.