Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagina Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 16:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Nagina Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No in-depth coverage found. Fails WP:NCORP.  Greenbörg  (talk)  07:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unable to find any news articles with non-trivial coverage. I created this in 2006 while removing irrelevant information from Nagina. utcursch &#124; talk 13:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep after Ngrewal1's edits. The article still needs more in-depth sources, but one of the sources describes the organization as "one of the oldest textile groups in the country", which indicates some notability. utcursch &#124; talk 22:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 05:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Nagina Group of companies is a major textile producer and exporter of textiles from Pakistan. The Group's textile subsidiary company Prosperity Weaving Mills Limited is traded on the Karachi Stock Exchange. An article by a major business newspaper of Pakistan Business Recorder verifies this information and its reference is included in my given references. Redid the Nagina Group article today with references from 3 major newspapers of Pakistan which had in-depth news coverage.Ngrewal1 (talk) 20:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability. Most of the references are run-of-the-mill business or company announcement that fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. This dawn.com reference fails since the only piece related to the company is entirely based on an interview with the CEO and fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. This brecorder.com reference is borderline but since it fails to attribute a journalist it fails the criteria for a reliable source. It is also questionable if there is any real independent analysis and/or opinion in this article. At this point in time, my !vote is to delete but I'll check back to see if more references can be found. -- HighKing ++ 11:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG, and notable based on the fact that it is stock exchange listed.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 04:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.