Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nai(caste)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No valid reason given for deletion. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Nai (caste)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  (caste) Stats )

Reason Ajnabh (talk) 04:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC) This article doesn't show nai caste history and doesn't respond on talk page this article doesn't describe nai cast with full respect and not include full caste name and not include all nai surnames and nai caste article doesn't have citations and reference. What i right is all true — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 10:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC) Nai (caste) only give citations about state nothing else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 11:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC) OBC only show economically Backwardness nothing else what that meaning,What connection with Nai Caste. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 11:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC) This article about OBC not about nai cast it should be delete Speedily or name it information about obc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 16:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 March 20.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters. —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep assuming this nomination is for the article Nai (caste) and not some other page. ‘Doesn’t show history’ is not a reason for deletion. ‘Doesn’t describe Nai caste with full respect’ is not a reason for deletion. Anyone is free to edit the content if they wish to. Saying the article doesn’t have citations and refs just isn’t true. Mccapra (talk) 07:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: Article is very properly sourced. Don't see why it was nominated. GN-z11  ☎  ★ 15:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? The article you nominated for deletion is CLEARLY about the Nai caste. GN-z11  ☎  ★ 18:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

According my opinion nai caste page doesn't represent Nai caste properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 01:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC) And who doesn't see any mistake in Nai caste article let me tell everyone nai doesn't adopted surname from bramhan Sharma are using by them because they are bramha kshatriya or rajrishi and (gohil)is not surname of Nai caste. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 02:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC) And they divided into vaghela parmara question when — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 02:10, 21 March 2019 (UTC) I don't think this article should be publish on Wikipedia because of the information is giving is not true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 06:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Ex =basic information almost all information is not true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs) 06:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep defective nomination. If there is a content or naming dispute, the article should be edited or a discussion about a renaming should be started on the article's talk page. Formally, the article appears properly sourced and the topic is notable. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 13:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.