Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naima Mora


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Naima Mora

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person.Dubiously sourced. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 18:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 18:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 18:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - you’ve nominated a number of articles about America’s Next Top Model contestants recently - I’d advise you to in future bundle related topics into one AfD discussion instead of nominating individual articles separately (see WP:MULTIAFD for instructions). Also, I’d advise you to give a more specific reason than “non-notable person”, per WP:JNN. Thank you. Linguist un Eins uno 18:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Was WP:BEFORE observed in this case? The subject is prominently discussed in this New York Times article, which mentions Mora having written her book and done a TED talk. Also listed as one of the "most fascinating contestants" in this New York Post article. bd2412  T 19:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Absolutely no notability problem. Sportsfan 1234, if you feel that the referencing in the article is insufficient you can add references as you wish. AfDs need to be based in research and previous procedures that failed. Not following WP:BEFORE means that likely you'll be wasting the time of your colleagues. gidonb (talk) 23:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per the coverage presented by bd2412  indicating in-depth coverage even beyond this person's modeling career. --Oakshade (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep – winner of a major reality show who went on to work prominently in the field. I would add, however, that the article needs serious work to be up to encyclopedic standard. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Commenting strictly on the notability of the article, especially when the reference provided by bd2412  is added to the article, it will pass WP:GNG. However, I agree with Tenebrae the article needs work to be encyclopedic and could be expanded. Operator873 CONNECT 23:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.