Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naina Ashwin Kumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Monty 845  03:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Naina Ashwin Kumar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, only one ref found in GHits/GNews/GBooks. Although the article claims a number of accomplishments, there are no reliable or verifiable sources. Extensive collection of YouTube links deleted per the external links policy. GregJackP  Boomer!   03:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - notability ≠ popularity. You may not find sources in English. She is not a celebrity, I grant you that. But, she has been covered by TV news reports in telegu channel TV9 multiple times (source and source) and also TV5 (tentative claim). She has appeared in the news for her skills in table-tennis also (source). She is the youngest Asian to pass 10th exam when she was 8 years 3 months old(source). The Hindu reported about her. So I might be the lone voice here, but my vote goes to "keep". See this for more links to potential references. We might do well to watch out for FUTON bias, Publication bias and also language bias. Thank you,  Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 11:23, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 26.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  13:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gong   show  06:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep; The Hindu article and the comment of Mrt3366 are persuasive. --Tito Dutta (talk) 00:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.