Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naina Sarwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Naina Sarwar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't find any sources. Created by blocked user (paid). TamilMirchi (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: Sources on the page suggests it passes WP:GNG#Entertainers - "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Extended feature also here on her career . Again - the editor who is nominating has a history of putting articles up for deletion / creating unnotable articles of actors he likes without discussion. Neutral Fan (talk) 01:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment What about sources? We need sources that cover her in depth. She played the lead in one notable film while the other films are not notable because there is no significant coverage.TamilMirchi (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? All the other films are notable and do have reliable coverage, , , , Neutral Fan (talk) 01:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC).
 * She is not mentioned in the last three reviews (photo does not count).TamilMirchi (talk) 01:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * - and why doesn't photos count? where is the rule which says that? who ever created that ToI article - obviously acknowledge that Naina starred in those films. Anyway, along with the above - there is also these   . Surely, enough to stay. Neutral Fan (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete sources need to be about a person. If there are reviews of a film that fail to mention a particular person appearing in the film in them this is a sign the role is not significant and thus not leading to acting related notability. We also need to be very vigilant against articles created by processes involving paid editing. Wikipedia is not a Who's Who pay to get included platform.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - several sources about the person have now been added. Neutral Fan (talk) 22:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:06, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Article fails GNG, BASIC and NACTOR. Sources are mentions, nothing that covers the subject directly and indepth. It might just be TOOSOON, but WP is not CRYSTAL  // Timothy ::  talk  18:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.