Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naingimea Beiaruru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  14:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Naingimea Beiaruru

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. All current sources on the article are trivial. A google search doesn't turn up anything substantive. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not passing WP:GNG. --Angelo (talk) 23:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep He played football at an international level. Just because we can’t find anything online does not mean sources do not exist.  This is especially true of a country of population 120,000 with no online news site because they presumably publish their sources offline (I’m 99% sure sources do exist offline). 172.58.30.248 (talk) 05:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 10:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've searched in search engines other than Google and also found nothing of note. I am not at all convinced by the WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES argument either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Kiribati international footballers as an ATD. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's always a concern when the only link on Google that even sparked my interest was one to this AFD discussion. After checking Google, but also a few other sources including the Internet Archive which often finds older sources. Sources may exist, and if one finds them, we can recreate the article. Till then, the subject is not sufficiently notable, nor is the content verifiable and so the article ought to be deleted. MaxnaCarter (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.