Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naked (2017 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Keep per WP:ARTN (non-admin closure) A Guy into Books (talk) 08:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Naked (2017 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is over-reliant on unreliable affiliated sources and republished press releases. Without any WP:RS sources it possibly fails WP:GNG. A Guy into Books (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep because the topic is notable, regardless of what is in the Wikipedia article., see WP:ARTN. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 20:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: The sources do establish notability. KGirl  (Wanna chat?) 22:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough coverage around in reliable sources to establish notability. What sources the article uses has no bearing on notability. --Michig (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.