Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naked (production company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Naked (production company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The only sources are press releases discussing the merger with Boundless (production company), which is also currently at AfD. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Companies,  and United Kingdom. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect: An article describing the creation and merger of this and another subsidiary unit, which is also covered in one table line at Fremantle (company), and the various productions through this subsidiary are summarised at List of Fremantle productions. I am not seeing evidence that it has distinct notability; the coverage under these articles on the parent company seems sufficient. AllyD (talk) 07:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, though Naked's fore-runner (Naked Entertainment) seems to have been behind some well known UK television programmes, I'm struggling to find much about them that is not a slightly reworded press release, or anything in non-broadcasting industry media. The new iteration is a very new company, so this appears to be WP:TOOSOON. As a caveat, a search for "Naked" online can produce some questionable results at the best of times, but I'd be surprised if someone can come up with something to convince me to keep this article at the moment. Sionk (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.