Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakkasalem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. v/r - TP 00:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Nakkasalem

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of high-quality sources. The subject's notability is typified by the absence of an Indian article. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 01:13, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep It's a verified populated place: in addition to the reference in the article, it's listed in the National Panchayat Directory, and other sources which verify its existence can be easily found (just Google the name). Per AfD precedent, all verifiable populated places are notable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 06:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Tom Morris. Looks like a town to me.  Verified populated settlement.--Oakshade (talk) 04:17, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.