Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naksa Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep on the issue of "keep" vs "delete". No consensus on whether or not this subject deserves its own article or should be merged/redirected. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Naksa Day

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Duplicates information contained in 1967 Palestinian exodus, adding some additional contextual information. Any useful information, e.g. the reference to the 2005 book, may be merged into 1967 Palestinian exodus. Cs32en  Talk to me  01:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - Has the potential for considerable enlargement. The related Nakba Day is a substantial article now, and with additional research this stub could be fleshed out too. SteveStrummer (talk) 18:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 1967 Palestinian exodus, per WP: NOTDICDEF. Just a definition that will unlikely expand beyond a stub.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 19:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Obviously an independent encyclopedic subject and not something that should be subsumed. Ian Pitchford (talk) 07:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.