Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nalxhal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was unanimous delete. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 08:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Nalxhal
This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 17:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete: there are many papers out there; should we be listing all of them? If there is a prefessional/media response to it, it would be notable. But none is mentioned in the article. Where (talk) 18:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a medium for publication of scholarly pseudoscience articles. --Kinu 20:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not even a "scholarly" article. External link to "journal" indicates that anyone can submit (=self-publish), the journal even touts that it give the author "the opportunity for public presentation of theories, etc. without prior and arbitrary assessment, criticism or rejection by the recipient", ie. not peer reviewed.  This article is clearly original research. &mdash;ERcheck @ 23:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pseudoscientific fluff per ERcheck, WP:NOR, and WP:BALLS. Barno 23:58, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.