Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namah Pictures (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Namah Pictures
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to have not met with WP:GNG and WP:NPOV. Non notable film production company which hasn't produced any big budgeted films. It was already Afded before. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a G4 if there are no significant differences with the original. This seems to have been recreated by an WP:UPE (his user page has an empty COI template) who moved the draft directly to mainspace. If significantly different then Delete as the sources do not show the company meets WP:NORG as the coverage looks like the usual run of the mill rewrites of press releases and no indepth coverage of the subject. --Dom from Paris (talk) 11:07, 21 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.