Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NameSecure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 16:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

NameSecure
Ths domain registrar doesn't assert any claim to notability or any reason it should have an article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Delete Ardenn 05:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom --Mason 05:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. NicM 07:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC).


 * Comment I'm on the fence on this one. I routinely check out domain information and I frequently stumble upon registrations through this company. What would differentiate a random registrar from a wiki notable company? ccwaters 02:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * IMHO, something that puts them in the news. Ardenn 02:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or transwiki to Yellowikis. Stifle (talk) 20:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.