Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Name of the Rose (2003 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Name of the Rose (2003 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a short film, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NFILM. The only notability claim evident here is that it exists, which isn't automatically enough in and of itself -- but the article is completely unsourced, and even on a deep database search for 20-year-old sourcing that might not have Googled I still found absolutely nothing. And no, this isn't the film you thought of when you saw the title, either. Bearcat (talk) 03:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 03:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find anything while searching either. With what I saw while searching, if it wasn't a junk hit, it was either routine database listings or hits for the Sean Connery film - and that's with limiters in place. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia needs to stop being an IMDb mirror.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.