Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Named passenger trains in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was SPEEDY DELETE. &mdash; Lost (talk) 13:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Named passenger trains in India

 * — (View AfD)

Abandoned by its creator (hadn't been edited since December 15), and as it stands, gives no information at all, and even if fleshed out, is likely to be a list of little practical value. Delete. (I considered speedy deleting it as basically an empty article, but I thought it better to submit it for community consensus. --Nlu (talk) 06:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Give it more time to be worked on, It's the holiday season. DXRAW 07:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as the subject's notability is not asserted, nor is the subject suggested by the title even discussed in the article! Also, I appreciate the sentiment that editors not being online because of major religious holidays should be taken into account, but I can't say I support the idea of temporarily suspending WP policies for the holidays. Not everyone is Christian, and it's pretty much a holiday season for some religion all year.Charlie 08:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. The article is two sentences long, with no actual content or information.  The essence of an "empty article" that does not respond to its title.  If the original editor (or anyone else) wants to write this article, a speedy will not prejudice against recreation, and there would certainly be no significant loss of prior effort.  Serpent&#39;s Choice 08:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Good point - so tagged. Charlie 08:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * This article is a result of a wrong move. A template talk page (created by my bot) was moved to the current title. I am speedy deleting the article &mdash; Lost (talk) 13:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.