Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of God Bible


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sacred Name Bibles. Closing as a merge because consensus is split on whether any information here is worth keeping. (non-admin closure) clpo13(talk) 21:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Names of God Bible

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find coverage of this book in reliable sources, suggesting that it is not notable. The creator suggested a merge, but I don't see the point since there's no reliable third-party sourcing. Not every book gets coverage in Wikipedia, that's just not how it works. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 16:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sacred Name Bibles, as it is one of those, and it is a plausible search term. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge (rather than plain redirect), unless all the others give the same detail of all the divine names. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Limited merge, probably just the name (as a list entry) and the Rau citation, and redirect. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sacred Name Bibles, as per Bushranger. As for merging, this book already does appear in a list on the target page.  And the Rau citation doesn't seem to be so much about this book itself, but more of a generic discussion of sacred-name translations.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * IMHO the Rau citation still confers more notability than the existing publisher's citation in the Sacred Name Bibles list. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.