Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namita Banka (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Namita Banka
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable outside of company, fails to establish notability as an individual. All of her news coverage are primarily for the company. Meeanaya (talk) 04:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment- Her previous AFD was based on weak comments by new users & IP address with possible COI and have not discussed whether Namita Banka is notable as an individual or not. Meeanaya (talk) 04:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 04:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: the Cartier Women's Initiative Awards is for her, not her company, and so is much of the coverage. Pam  D  11:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd also hardly call the previous AfD keeps "weak comments from new users". Pam  D  12:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * There has to be something significant coming from her other just receiving some award. Banka is not notable if we are looking at the bigger picture, this is obviously a paid PR, which deserves a deletion. Meeanaya (talk) 04:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I agree that the keep !votes didn’t expound upon why they think she is notable beyond some award and that the article does seem promotional. Trillfendi (talk) 22:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not Who's who, one does not pay their way to inclusion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:46, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Just watched the previous AfD and came on conclusion that she wants to promote herself on the Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not place for promotion and recognition. Many people are doing social work and get local coverage then it doesn't mean they are eligible for having Wikipedia page. This person fails WP:GNG, not enough coverage in WP:RS and thus, it should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshil169 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.