Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namita Dubey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bade Bhaiyya Ki Dulhania. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Namita Dubey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Redirect to Bade Bhaiyya Ki Dulhania: This appeared to be a case of WP:BLP1E. The actress appeared in one show so far and I failed to find anything to support her role in anthology series Yeh Hai Aashiqui and MTV Webbed. I also can't find any significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources which addresses the topic directly and in details so I would say it fails WP:GNG as well. GSS (talk |c|em ) 11:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 11:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 11:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Wrong venue Nominator was reminded at Articles_for_deletion/Barbara_Opitz within the last two months that editorial decisions don't need administrative tools.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * As you already know but let me remind you again that AfD's always don't need admin tool for a closuer since we have NAC and taking another person's opinion is always valuable. Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 05:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * So our policies mean nothing if you can get an NAC to close the way that you want? Is that what you are saying?  One of the points that you are missing is that an editorial decision out of AfD is not binding, unless an admin chooses to allow him/herself to be sucked into a content dispute.  And an NAC closer by definition doesn't have the authority to make the decision binding.  Unscintillating (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Well I don't think if you notice what I said in my nomination. I clearly mention that This appear to be a case of WP:BLP1E and Redirect was my suggetion not demand so the outcome of this AfD can be diffrent. GSS (talk |c|em ) 06:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect as noted as we've actually used AfD for these matters frequently in the past to achieve consensus and WP:AfD itself notes it especially if the article is restored later, because there's nothing for independent notability, there's nothing guaranteeing a better article. SwisterTwister   talk  18:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect and one could have just done it without need for an AfD discussion, IMHO. Montanabw (talk) 11:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.