Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namman Muay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus here is that there is insufficient significant coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca  talk 22:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Namman Muay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is about a liniment but has no sources that actually mention it by name. The only source refers to the IKF's allowance of certain rubbing compounds which doesn't show this product is notable.Mdtemp (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I found one Thai boxing book written in Italian that mentioned the product briefly twice, once in a list of Thai boxing equipment, another time describing the use of the product. Boxe thailandese: muay thai, pages 53, 146–147. This mention is very brief, being without a discussion of the product's history or significance. I found no other third party sources discussing this product, only sales and promotion sites and booklets. Binksternet (talk) 03:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * A brief Google search reveals articles covering the subject from Positioning Magazine and Thai Post (both in Thai). --Paul_012 (talk) 09:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I call advertisement.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I found no significant independent coverage of this product. The sources mentioned by Paul_012 don't do it.  The first is a few paragraph profile of a company officer while the second is hard to read (at least via Google translate), but seems more of a PR announcement.  A concluding paragraph that says "Support Thailand because of the quality of our products" and "our products are sold in pharmacies nationwide" does not seem like independent news reporting. Papaursa (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.