Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nan Aron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:HEY Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Nan Aron

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to be notable. Basically a gadfly without impact, built on one Washington Post profile, fleeting mentions in reliable sources, and dead or inaccessible links. bd2412 T 17:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Cited by reliable sources in multiple articles including the New York Times (here, here, and here among others), this book, Time magazine, PBS... 9H48F (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The citiations are either to sources that do not show notability, or to passing mentions in articles that do not come to enough mention to pass GNG. Name dropping does not equal notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I have just added an article from 2001 about her and a conservative equivalent and their role in judicial nomination confirmation processes, which describes her (then) as a key player. There are plenty of other sources in Newspapers.com, certainly enough to meet WP:GNG - I will try to add more. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet GNG, maybe her book might help if there was an article about that.  Cheerio042 (talk) 19:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)  Blocked sock. Britishfinance (talk) 09:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - references seem to establish enough notability to meet GNG in terms of involvement in judicial nominations, esp. one sources added by RebeccaGreen. Bookscale (talk) 22:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added more references, including reviews of her first book (in the American Bar Association Journal and the Harvard Law Review) and more articles about her. The ABA Journal frequently quotes her - if the article was expanded to include more information about specific judicial nomination campaigns of hers, those references could be added too. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, per references found and added by RebeccaGreen. Article is substantially improved. -- &oelig; &trade; 20:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources added during discussion by User:RebeccaGreen.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.