Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana Ama Poku


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Opinions of low-participation accounts are given little weight, leaving a clear consensus for deletion. BD2412 T 04:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Nana Ama Poku

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is not inherited from being a Deputy CEO of a bank. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: While the "keep" !vote does not address WP:GNG and hence I am currently leaning towards closing as delete, I am going to need further analysis of the sources present in the article before a consensus is reached.
 * Delete a non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - mid-level functionary of a quasi-government bank. Fails WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject under discussion is notable for various tangible references which justifies her notability. The subject has track records of enough information online which makes her notable. Her contribution and recognition as a Ghanaian Banking executive is clearly significant in most media platforms online especially. Not only is the subject a Deputy CEO, but is noted for  her contribution to Banking and Businesses in Ghana. There have been cases where she is often interviewed on major news platforms in Ghana to educate and talk about investment and businesses in Ghana. Respectyourselfhere (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 00:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The following references are verifiable and objective evidence that the subject has received significant coverage and attention from independent sources to support my notability claims WP:GNG: https://yen.com.gh/179259-meet-ghanaian-female-banker-deputy-ceo-mba-18-years-experience.html, https://hypercitigh.com/business/nana-ama-poku-amongst-women-taking-over-top-positions-in-the-banking-industries/, https://www.myjoyonline.com/deputy-exim-bank-ceo-nana-ama-poku-wins-global-leadership-excellence-award/, https://yen.com.gh/179259-meet-ghanaian-female-banker-deputy-ceo-mba-18-years-experience.html, https://www.amazonswatchmagazine.com/exclusive-qa/showcase-successful-female-leaders-to-inspire-the-younger-generation-nana-ama-poku/attachment/nana-ama-poku/. The subject is essentially not a mere short-term interest and should therefore be kept. Respectyourselfhere (talk) 11:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Please be aware that voting twice isn't allowed, especially since you are the author of the article. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 08:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable for her significant roles in the Ghanaian banking sector. WP:GNG. Zbonzome (talk). 06:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Please note that this account is a newly-created WP:SPA. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject meets the notability criteria since she has been significantly recognised by many media houses in Ghana and the sources cited are verifiable  R obert Jamal  …talk to me💬 16:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Per last relist.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 03:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * '''Keep notable for various tangible references and her significant roles.Jemima2019 (talk) 08:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: a WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable executive. Does not meet WP:BASIC per review of available sources. --K.e.coffman (talk) 19:47, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per above. I can't attest to Zbonzome's claim that the subject holds "significant roles" (Deputy Chief Executive Officer...Member of the Chartered Institute of Marketing... doesn't seem all that encyclopedically significant on it's face), and unlike Robertjamal12, I don't see how the sources are "verifiable", etc. — Alalch Emis (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: clearly nothing more than a promo page and Wikipedia is not Linkedin or a "Who's who". See WP:NOTNEWS. Kierzek (talk) 22:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.