Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Moran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Nancy Moran

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the notability guideline for musicians and bands and the general notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. De-PROD-ed by along with several others. I was going to bundle these as nearly all of them cite no reliable sources that suggest they pass WP:BAND aside from database-style entries in AllMusic or affiliated sources and were created by the same user, however I am mindful of avoiding a trainwreck so I am nominating each of them individually.  SITH   (talk)   10:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   SITH   (talk)   11:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Four Bitchin' Babes. One of a spate of prods by the nominator in a short space of time. I indicated when I deproded it that I found coverage, which they haven't asked about. Coverage includes, , and more paywalled sites. Editors in the US may be able to find more, as a lot of US news articles are blocked over here. --Michig (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment The Nom may have avoided a trainwreck by nominating articles individually, but 25 at once is far too many! Not citing reliable sources is not a reason to delete, per WP:NEXIST. I have already added one source to this article, and will try to find and add more to this and the other 24 articles, in order to assess whether they do meet notability guidelines. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * , and in the paragraph above, WP:NRV, verifiable evidence is required. Otherwise it's just faith.  And not citing reliable sources is not my rationale, my rationale is that WP:MUSICBIO is not passed.    SITH   (talk)   15:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, verifiable by some editors, even if not by all. We can't know whether WP:MUSICBIO is or is not passed without knowing what reviews exist, for example. Quotes in other sources indicate that Moran was reviewed in the magazine Dirty Linen, but as that's not online, it's probably not possible to confirm that, unless someone has access to the back copies. Finding evidence requires digging, which takes time. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  00:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added some more sources, and I think she has enough to pass WP:GNG. If the article is not kept, it should be merged to Four Bitchin' Babes, of which she is a longtime member. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.