Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Ripton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Nancy Ripton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. WP:BLP of a magazine editor and writer, which is based entirely on primary sources with the exception of a single news article which isn't about her, but merely includes her giving soundbite about a subject (and even if we accepted that, it still takes more than just one reliable independent source.) There's also a conflict of interest here, if you compare the creator's username to the name of the website the subject founded. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which magazine editors, writers or website founders are automatically entitled to create an article about themselves just because they exist -- they must be the subject of enough media coverage to pass WP:GNG for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 17:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG per Bearcat. SW3 5DL (talk) 02:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.