Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Vandal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  howch e  ng   {chat} 19:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Nancy Vandal
Band vanity. This borders on speedy. To cut the crap from the article - it's basically a band thats main claim to fame is a single gig at Sydney University - definitely not encyclopaedic Werdna648T/C\@ 05:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. Blnguyen 05:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable musical group per nomination. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-18 11:34Z 
 * Keep. Check here for discography. Certainly seem notable. Cnwb 00:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Cnwb 00:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep well known Australian band, with several albums, meets WP:MUSIC.--nixie 00:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep (and clean up extensively). Notable band with a notable approach to music and entertainment.  An An  01:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Heck if I have heard of them they must be pretty famous. Shame the article is so bad though. Has anyone checked if it is a copyvio? --Martyman- (talk) 01:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and send to cleanup, per above. Lists this and this as sources, doesn't appear to be copying either of them. --bainer (talk) 01:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * WARNING: One of those sources started opening popups and trying to install software on my machine. --Martyman- (talk) 02:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per nixie pfctdayelise 02:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't know how you get that their main claim to fame is a gig a Sydney Uni, even if the rest of it it really badly written. JPD (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup -- Astrokey44 |talk 13:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.