Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nando Silva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Nando Silva

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL, his professional play being limited to 109 minutes (barely more than one game) in the league and no cup games. Also has had an unassuming amateur career since leaving the pro tier. Geschichte (talk) 07:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Passing NFOOTY does not automatically make a subject notable. GauchoDude (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I disagree with that argument.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: WP:ATHLETE states that "If the article does meet the criteria set forth below [as in NFOOTY], then it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article," then later "The guideline on this page provides bright-line guidance to enable editors to determine quickly if a subject is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline." The purpose of this AfD is to shed light as to whether the subject passes GNG, which it appears they have not, not whether they've made it into 1 minute of a fully professional league. GauchoDude (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. While technically passes WP:NFOOTBALL, fails WP:GNG which supersedes. Consensus for this situation resulting in delete on AfD discussions for Olymbios Antoniades, Agapios Agapiou, et. al. GauchoDude (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Passes NFOOTY. Still fails to pass GNG. Lorenzo the great (talk) 21:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG.Advait (talk) 10:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is no indication nor any evidence that Nando Silva meets GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per failing WP:GNG. 1 minute of WP:FPL doesn't give automatic notability. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.