Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nangir Khel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The entirety of the one-sentence unsourced content is already in the article Babozai. If there is any substantial sourced content that makes this subtribe notable, the article can be recreated.  Sandstein  06:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Nangir Khel

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The only information I can find about the location is regarding the Nangar Khel incident. This in itself does not make the city notable. I cannot find any more sources, seems to fail WP:NTEMP NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 06:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC) Keep - This is a stub. What is the point of having stubs available as a prompt for expansion if they are going to be deleted? The nominator's reference to "the city" suggests a lack of acquaintance with the text which refers to the subject as a "tribe". Wikipedia editors often seem determined to reinforce Wikipedia's already excessive ethnocentricity. Opbeith (talk) 11:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Whe whole point of this deletion is is this a tribe or a city/town. If it is a city/town I vote keep, but it is hard to determine which one it is. Looking back, you might keep it per WP:DEFACTONativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 02:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Nangir Khel is a very small branch of the clan Babozai. This branch exists only in Aloch, Puran and the total population of the tribe may be a few hundreds. It is proposed that the author may include this in the main article on Babozai tribe.--Seraj-ul-Haq 17:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Serajulhaque (talk • contribs)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions.  —CordeliaNaismith (talk) 14:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This article deals with a tribe, not a city or location. Or am I wrong? I can't find any informations about the subject, unrelated to Wikipedia. However, the problem could be caused by misspelling or simply by lack of references in English language. --Vejvančický (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This article deals with a tribe, not a city or location. Or am I wrong? I can't find any informations about the subject, unrelated to Wikipedia. However, the problem could be caused by misspelling or simply by lack of references in English language. --Vejvančický (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete It's already included in Babozai, and this article adds nothing to that - if some notable information should be found about the various sub-sub-tribes, it can easily go in the main article. (It's arguable that Babozai should be split into two, one for the Pakistani town and one for the tribe, but that's for another time and place) -- Boing!   said Zebedee  10:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.