Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanjing Massacre (no images)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 19:54, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

Nanjing Massacre (no images)
POV fork of Nanjing Massacre. Delete. Postdlf 16:13, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) see these images,for you crudity or brutal evidence.i sugest why mantain these option,if totally well,still apareing redundant but are well!(Wlad K)
 * Delete. There must be a better solution than forking every article with potentially objectionable images. Wmahan. 17:13, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. People should copy the entire WP database to their own server and censor away to their heart's delight. --Lee Hunter 17:35, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV fork. RickK 21:52, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * i am considered correct why exist one page how this,for why certain persons can t to

Comment. Does javascript work on wiki pages? -- Natalinasmpf 22:59, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; forks are bad for the project. This is a good example.  Better to use the talk page and work for consensus and compromise if necessary. Antandrus 01:18, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV forks. Jayjg (talk) 03:06, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, PoV fork. Megan1967 05:57, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no point70.49.38.235 23:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not needed Sabine's Sunbird 04:53, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Ditto with the above. Can't this be supplemented with javascript? -- Natalinasmpf 00:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, if you don't like the images you can always turn them off before viewing the page, or write a JavaScript engine as suggested above. Are we going to have a similar "no guts" page for Auswitz (sorry if I've spelled it wrong) and other massacres? No? Then not for this either. If all else fails, the image thumbnails/frames could be replaced with text-links saying "the corpses of the victims (WARNING: potentially objectionable content)" or something like that. Master Thief Garrett 03:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; POV Fork. &mdash; Davenbelle 17:03, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV fork. --Viriditas  | Talk 07:13, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would like however, a function to disable images on all articles. RustyCale 12:20, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd certainly support that, if it's 100% user-controlled. It would certainly eviscerate any rationale for taming down "inappropriate" images or creating "alternative" versions like this one.  The only concerns that should guide us in illustrating articles is whether it is informative and relevant to the article, regardless of whether it's on Sesame Street or autofellatio.  Postdlf 18:38, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.