Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NanoFX Evolved


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 22:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

NanoFX Evolved

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Articles, probably by the developers, about an unreleased custom game engine and a space combat simulation game being developed for it. Release dates have "not yet been determined." References are their websites and a game developers' group. Searches find discussion in forums and Youtube and the like, but no independent reliable source.One article de-prodded by another editor with no improvement and no reason given - "deprod please take to afd if you want ok--", the other may well encounter a drive-by deprodder too, so to save time I bring them both here. If these projects are completed and released, and if they then get comment from independent sources, they may become notable enough for articles; but for now, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and is not for promoting unreleased projects. Delete both. JohnCD (talk) 10:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both per nom. These violate WP:CRYSTAL, and additionally do not meet notability guidelines.  If/when these are released, and if/when they get significant coverage from independent sources, articles can be created. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  16:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete both - no reliable sources to establish tno notability for either article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete both per WP:CRYSTAL as it's just to soon to tell about future notability. Clearly, they don't meet our notability standards in the present.   Them  From  Space  05:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.