Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NanoInk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. or nomination withdrawn, take your pick (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

NanoInk

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I found this with a WP:PROD tag on it but the nominator said on the talk page that he/she wanted to discuss deletion, so I've changed it to an AfD. The concern on the prod tag was "Reads as a long press release. Tagged as such for more than a year, with little improvement." I have no opinion of my own as yet. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I found external links such as this one which seem to establish some notability for this operation. The nominated article is in dire need of a re-write to remove the hideous levels of ad-speak. X Marx the Spot (talk) 22:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Amongst all of the regurgitated press releases a Google News archive search finds significant coverage in reliable sources such as . Phil Bridger (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.