Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NanoNAS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

NanoNAS

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article starts off by incorrectly asserting that it's the successor of the GPL'd NASLite 1.x. That is actually incorrect. NASLite-2 is the actual successor. See company's own product pages. I can find no significant independent coverage for this sofware. (Beware that this article is about a piece of hardware, and therm is used generically in the title) Pcap ping  02:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 00:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  02:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I can find one detailed independent review at: . There are also a variety of more informal discussions, such as ; .  I think I lean towards weak delete unless someone finds other sources.  LotLE × talk  23:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's something else: a hardware product by another company, see caveat in my nomination. Pcap ping  20:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:18, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. 3rd week and no keep !votes. Treat as uncontested PROD.   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 00:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.