Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanoceramic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Nanoceramic

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Neologism; article's creator apparently works for a firm called Cambridge Nanolitic which coined the term and is trying to raise its profile. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:19, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. Monterey Bay (talk) 23:55, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep if re-written for copyvios. There does appear to be some some scientific support for "nanoceramics":; . The opening paragraph appears to be a copypaste from this 2008 report. Singularity42 (talk) 21:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, then redirect to Nanocomposite, the more standard name for this type of material. None of the present material is usable at the target article no matter which way the copyvio concerns get resolved. - 2/0 (cont.) 21:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.