Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanodams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Nanodams

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod, removed by anon IP. Non-notable concept. Article seems to be a coatrack for promoting the idea. Either way, it fails WP:GNG. I've looked around for sources for this and can't really find any that apply. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no significant coverage. -- Nuujinn (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Non notable. This seems to be an advertisement. No third party sources, can't even find any... Undead Warrior (talk) 02:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, only one source which is promoting the idea. If independent sources can be found at a later date, article can be restarted with them.  Sea photo Talk  05:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Concur with Undead Warrior. Csrwizard (talk) 06:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've searched and all I can find is the organization's own site, which is a primary source, and no relevant secondary sources. So, primary source only, and a bit promotional in style. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Undead Warrior nailed it. Etrigan (talk) 16:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.